putting the cache of Firefox or other programs on a RAM-disk: speed benefits?Ĥ. Are there also noticeable speed benefits?ģ. putting the XP page file on a RAM-disk: one (possible) benefit would be non-recoverability. (The Ramdisk Plus software was brought up in this older thread that didn't catch on )Ģ. Has anyone tried that? Does it work well? Any drawbacks? (Note: even if there are great problems with that I'm still interested in the RAM-disk questions below - 3GB is still a lot of memory for many cases so I could still test to devote a bit of that for a RAM-disk) ![]() It can also use the stubbornly inaccessable memory between 3.2GB and 4GB." Our patent pending technology can access memory beyond the limitation imposed by a Windows 32-bit operating system! In other words, RamDisk Plus 9 can use "unmanaged" Windows' memory e.g. "RamDisk Plus 9 has a most unique feature. This RAM-disk program claims to use the memory XP can't use as regular memory for a RAM-disk: ![]() So I'm looking into the possibilities of using the leftover memory as a RAM-disk. Together with my two previous 1GB sticks I'll then have a total of 6GB.īut from what I've read XP can only make use of a bit above 3GB for regular RAM for some complex reasons. I'm soon upgrading my XP 32bit system with two new 2GB sticks of RAM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |